Professor of Toxicology and Health Effects of Electromagnetism Dr. Paul Heroux joins Rick Sanchez to discuss growing concerns about cellphone towers and their adverse health effects on children. He says that corporations’ political power has manipulated FCC standards and is why “the irradiation of the population has gotten out of hand.”
https://www.mcgill.ca/epi-biostat-occh/paul-heroux Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health
http://www.invitroplus.mcgill.ca InVitroPlus is a research laboratory dedicated to the therapeutic and pathological effects of electromagnetism. It performs precision assessments of the main human cancer cell lines.
Transcript of the interview:
You’re on the news with Rick Sanchez, we have been all over this developing story of a cell phone tower in California, at a school where parents say it’s caused their children they get cancer. It’s just one of the many places where these concerns have been springing up and which promises to get even worse. With the advent of 5g technology, right. 5g may be really good for cell phones in terms of how they work when it comes to speed. Also wireless accessibility, apparently it promises to be able to let us use our cell phones anywhere, anytime. But will it be good for our health. Right? A key question, right? For example, families at this Elementary School in California say their children got cancer from the cell phone tower that happened to be right smack dab in the middle of the school. Are they right?
Joining us now is Dr. Paul Heroux. He is a professor of toxicology and the health effects of electromagnetic electromagnetism did well with that pronunciation, huh? He’s at the McGill School of Medicine in Montreal, Canada.
Professor, thanks so much for joining us. So what do you say about this particular case, and then we’ll move on to others. These parents, they look, they put the cell phone tower right smack dab in the middle of the school. And low and behold, a lot of our children ended up getting cancer, are they? Are they correct on this?
Look Rick. The problem is that corporations don’t have children. People have children, and all of these people who direct Corporation, so when they go to work, they forget about their children, which is why some of them put photographs on their desk to remind themselves, because their behavior is about selling things, and competition, and things like that. So this is why irradiation of the population of the United States has gotten out of hand.
Well, that’s interesting, you would say that, I guess I put myself in their shoes, right? If I’m a stockholder, for a company, like I don’t know, whatever, either one of our companies or a foreign company. And I am thinking, Oh my gosh, there’s billions of dollars to be made in this new technology. And the more advanced we make it, the bigger we make it, the more money we will make. What’s to stop me from continuing to blow this thing up?
Yes, what you can do is that you can create fake science that essentially imagines that the agent that you depend on, has no health effects whatsoever. If you look back in time, there was what I would call it heat war in the past, there wasn’t only a Cold War, there was a heat war. What this means is that the nations of the East, the Eastern Bloc, said that this radiation is dangerous, and they adopted standards at thousand times lower than the United States. By contrast, in the United States the mentality was there so much money to be made, we will have very high standards. In other words, there’s no effect beyond what happens in the microwave oven. And this will allow us to deploy unlimited amounts of systems. And what we’re seeing now is that a large, prestigious unit in the government of the United States the national toxicology program has confirmed that the FCC standard upon which American industry relied is wrong.
So what you’re saying, and let’s bring this down the ladder of obstructions to something that’s very rudimentary so people can understand – if your child is playing in a playground, or is that a school where there’s one of these cell phone towers, and next year, that cell phone tower is going to be on steroids. As we develop 5g technology, you’re saying that parents should be concerned of an increase of disease, or some kind of radiation affecting that child? Point Blank?
Yes, it would be cancer, it would be learning disabilities, it would be nosebleeds we already know from the past environment, that there’s a number of children who cannot attend school because they can’t tolerate the radiation. Industry is slated to go ahead and increase this level of radiation. This is clearly the wrong direction to go.
Well, I’ll tell you what, Professor, you make a very compelling argument. We thank You, Sir, for taking us through that. We look forward to talking to you about this once again.